Or: Why the Best PMs in the AI Era Coach First and Manage
Second
I almost skipped the coaching certification.
When I joined the John Maxwell team, the coaching program
was part of the package. And honestly? I wasn't that interested. I was doing
well in my career. I had built successful PMOs. I had a reputation for getting
results.
What did I need a coaching certification for?
But I went. And a trainer named Christian Simpson changed
everything.
He was talking about directive leadership—how most leaders
just answer questions, tell people what to do, and keep everyone dependent on
them for direction.
That was me. I was a directive leader. And I knew it,
because the proof showed up every time I tried to take a vacation.
My phone would ring constantly. I'd come back to disaster
areas. Everything waited for me because I had built a team that couldn't
function without my answers.
I thought I was being helpful. I was actually being a
bottleneck.
And then Christian said the thing that rewired how I lead:
"If you give somebody the answer, you rob them of a
lifetime of learning."
That hit me.
If you give someone the answer, they'll ask the same
question next time. Because they didn't learn—they were just told.
But if they find the answer? If they work through the
problem, make the connections, arrive at the solution themselves?
They'll never forget it.
From Manager to Coach: The Shift That Changes Everything
There's a debate I've been in a hundred times about whether
project management is "command and control."
When I went through my first Agile training, they described
project management like Godzilla stomping through cities. Commanding.
Controlling. Dictating.
And Agile? It was communal living, group hugs, servant
leadership, butterflies everywhere.
I always pushed back on that.
I was never a command-and-control PM. Even
before my personal development journey, I believed in enabling people over
directing them. I just didn't have the language for it.
But here's the real distinction that matters:
Old PM role: Here's the plan. Here's your task.
Go do it.
New PM role: What do you need to succeed? How
can I remove the obstacles in your way?
One extracts work from people. The other builds capacity in
people.
And in the AI era, that difference has never
mattered more.
Here's why:
AI can automate task management. It can build schedules,
generate reports, write requirements, summarize meetings. All the things that
used to justify our existence as schedulers and documenters?
Gone. Or going.
But what AI cannot touch is the emotional side of project
work.
Conflict between two senior engineers who both think they're
right and neither is wrong.
A team member withdrawing quietly because scope keeps
changing and nobody's noticing.
A junior PM who doesn't know how to push back on a sponsor
without getting their head taken off.
That's where we live now. That's the new PM value zone.
And you can't navigate that by giving answers.
You navigate it by asking the right questions.
The Coaching Mindset vs. The Management Mindset
|
Manager |
Coach |
|
Provides the answer |
Asks questions to surface the answer |
|
Directs action |
Creates space for discovery |
|
Extracts work |
Develops people |
|
Tells people what's wrong |
Helps people see what they haven't seen |
|
Creates dependency |
Builds capability |
The shift isn't about being softer. It's about being
smarter.
People own the solutions they create. When the
answer comes from them—when they worked through it, wrestled with it, arrived
at it—they execute it with conviction, not compliance.
And remember what we covered in Episode 8? Compliance leads
to resistance. Resistance leads to revenge. Revenge leads to resentment.
Coaching is the antidote to all three R's.
The Core Coaching Skills Every PM Needs Right Now
Active Listening: Not just hearing words—hearing
what's not being said. The fear underneath the frustration.
The confusion beneath the compliance. The real blocker hiding behind
"everything's fine."
Powerful Questions: Questions that help people
think differently, not just answer you. "What options have you already
considered?" beats "Have you tried X?" every time.
Holding Space: Creating safety for the hard
conversations. Pausing. Sitting in the silence instead of rushing to fill it.
Capability Building: Developing people, not just
extracting work from them. Asking "what would help you grow through
this?" alongside "what do you need to ship this?"
Accountability with Empathy: High standards AND
high support. Both. Not one or the other.
The Story That Made It Click
Let me tell you the best coaching moment I've ever been on
the receiving end of.
I was building out the GrowthDay platform for Brendan
Bouchard. And I was having a real problem with one of my team members. I was
frustrated. Genuinely frustrated.
So I called Brendan.
And I went. I vented. I laid it all out—every frustration,
every grievance, everything this person had done that was driving me crazy.
Brendan just listened. The whole time.
And when I was finally done, he asked me one question:
"Huh. Well, what did he say when you told him all
this?"
Silence.
What did he say... when I told him.
I hadn't told him.
Not one word of what I'd just spent ten minutes telling
Brendan had ever been said directly to the person I was frustrated with.
And in that moment I realized: I had been complaining to the
boss about someone I hadn't even attempted to talk to myself.
Brendan didn't tell me that. He didn't say, "You need
to go have that conversation." He didn't lecture me about going around
someone.
He asked one question.
And I arrived at the answer myself.
That's a lifetime of learning in a single sentence.
I've never forgotten it. And I've never again brought a
complaint to someone's supervisor without first having the conversation
directly.
That's coaching.
Now Let's Use AI to Get Better at It
Here's the beautiful irony: The tool that people worry will
replace human connection is actually one of the best tools I've ever found
for preparing for human connection.
AI won't coach your team for you. But it will help you show
up to coaching conversations more prepared, more thoughtful, and more focused
on the right questions.
Let me show you three prompts I use.
Prompt 1: Coaching Conversation Planner (Your
Non-Negotiable)
The situation I gave it:
Sarah—a senior back-end engineer on the Social Wishing
project—has been withdrawing. She used to drive planning discussions and code
reviews. Now she's quiet, says "whatever the team decides," works
late but doesn't surface blockers, and gives short answers in one-on-ones.
Her velocity is still fine. Her engagement is not.
What ChatGPT gave me:
"Sarah still delivers. The risk sits in
disengagement—senior engineers influence architecture, team energy, and
decision quality. If she withdraws, the team loses signal."
Powerful questions by theme:
- "What
have the last few sprints felt like from your perspective?"
- "When
scope changes come up, what goes through your mind?"
- "What
are you carrying that the team doesn't see?"
Claude's opening:
"Sarah, I wanted to carve out some time that isn't
about tickets or sprint status. How are you actually doing?"
And then: Full stop. Don't add qualifiers or
softeners. Let her decide how much to give you.
If she says "fine" or "busy," Claude
told me:
"Follow with: 'I believe that you're busy. What I'm
asking is whether busy feels okay right now—or whether it's starting to wear on
you.'"
That's not a script. That's a doorway.
Claude also gave me the question sequence:
- Energy
and load
- Work
experience
- What
she needs
- What
adjustment to watch for if she deflects
This took me two minutes to generate. The conversation
itself might be the most important one I have this week.
Prompt 2: Powerful Coaching Questions Library
This one builds you a reusable toolkit organized by
situation type.
Common PM situations:
- Team
member stuck and escalating
- Two
team members in conflict
- Team
member underperforming but unaware
- Team
member wants career growth
- Team
member resistant to change
My favorite questions from what the AI generated:
For a stuck team member:
- "If
you had to make this decision without me, what would you do?"
- "What's
the smallest step you could take to test a direction?"
For conflict:
- "What
outcome do you actually want from this situation?"
- "What
part of this disagreement is about facts versus preferences?"
For underperforming but unaware:
- "What
are you most proud of from the last month—and what would you do
differently?"
- "Is
there anything getting in the way of your best work that I don't know
about?"
The most important coaching principle the AI surfaced:
Don't lead the witness.
❌ "Don't you think we should
handle the architecture this way?" ✅ "What architecture options
do you see?"
❌ "Do you think it would
help to talk to them directly?" ✅ "What options have you
considered?"
Same destination. Completely different journey. And the
journey is where the learning lives.
Prompt 3: Conflict Coaching Facilitator
The scenario: Two senior engineers at an
impasse. Sarah wants microservices from day one (scalability). Tom wants
monolith first (speed to MVP). Both are dug in. The debate is getting personal.
Claude's diagnosis:
"Architecture debates between senior engineers
rarely stay technical this long unless something else is driving them. This
conflict has three layers: 1. Risk tolerance and time horizon 2.
Identity and credibility 3. Decision authority ambiguity
Until you address layer three, layers one and two will
keep feeding each other."
ChatGPT's framing:
"Sarah sees Tom as cutting corners. Tom sees Sarah
as slowing the team with unnecessary complexity. Both are trying to protect the
project from risk—but they can't see that in each other.
The goal of your conversation is to reframe the debate
from personal positions to shared project outcomes."
Questions for Tom:
- "What
risks do you see if we start with microservices?"
- "What
assumptions are you making about future scale?"
Questions for Sarah:
- "What
specifically makes you confident a monolith won't become a problem at
scale?"
- "What's
your read on where the product is heading in 18 months?"
What the AI surfaces that's most valuable:
What's not being said.
Tom isn't saying, "I'm scared we're going to miss the
launch date and I'll be blamed."
Sarah isn't saying, "I've seen monoliths become
nightmare refactors and I can't watch it happen again."
Those are the real conversations. And you can't get there by
asking about architecture.
Your Non-Negotiable Experiment This Week
Use the Coaching Conversation Planner to
prepare for a real coaching conversation this week.
Then ask at least three coaching questions—and
resist the urge to answer them yourself.
Here's what I want you to notice:
- How
does the person respond to questions versus directives?
- Do
they arrive at solutions you hadn't thought of?
- Does
coaching build capability and ownership in a way that managing doesn't?
Because here's the thing:
The tasks are getting automated. The human side of
projects—the conflict, the fear, the ambiguity, the growth—that's becoming our
entire job.
If you're still managing in a world that needs coaching,
you're optimizing for a role that's disappearing.
But if you learn to ask the right questions?
You become the person no AI will ever replace.
Next time: Work-Life Balance 2.0—how AI changes
the always-on PM trap. Excited to share some different ways of using AI to help
us become not just better PMs, but better humans.
Want these prompts ready to copy/paste? Head
to PMThatWorks.com for
the full library.
Now go prepare for that coaching conversation. Somebody on
your team is waiting for the right question.
— Rick A. Morris
The Prompts (Copy/Paste Ready)
Prompt 1 - Coaching Conversation Planner
You are an executive coach training project managers to
coach their teams effectively.
First, ask me 4–6 questions about the team member, the
situation they're facing, what I've observed, and what outcome I want from the
conversation.
Then provide a coaching conversation plan answering:
- What
is the coaching goal for this conversation?
- What
powerful questions should I ask to help this person think through the
situation themselves?
- What
am I listening for? (underlying concerns, assumptions, blind spots,
emotions)
- How
do I balance support with accountability?
- What's
my opening? (How do I set the tone and create safety?)
- What's
my closing? (How do I ensure clarity and commitment to action?)
Team member situation: [Enter Context]
Prompt 2 - Powerful Coaching Questions Library
You are a professional coach creating a question library for
PMs to use in team conversations.
Ask me 2–3 questions about common situations I face with my
team (performance issues, conflict, low morale, ambiguity, or resistance).
Then provide a library of powerful coaching questions
organized by situation type answering:
- What
are 5–7 coaching questions for each situation type?
- What
is each question designed to unlock? (self-awareness, ownership, options,
or commitment)
- When
should I use open-ended questions vs. more directed questions?
- How
do I avoid leading the witness and let people arrive at their own
insights?
Situations I commonly face: [Enter Situations]
Prompt 3 - Conflict Coaching Facilitator
You are a conflict resolution coach helping PMs facilitate
team conflicts.
Ask me 4–5 questions about the conflict, the people
involved, what each person wants, and what I've observed about the dynamic.
Then provide a facilitation strategy answering:
- What
is the underlying conflict? (goals, values, communication styles, resource
scarcity, or misunderstanding)
- How
do I create a safe space for the conversation?
- What
coaching questions do I ask each person to help them articulate their
perspective and needs?
- How
do I guide them toward mutual understanding—not just compromise?
- What
agreements or commitments do we need to leave the conversation with?
- How
do I follow up to ensure the conflict is resolved and not just paused?
Conflict situation: [Enter Context]
No comments:
Post a Comment